Thursday, April 14, 2016

Monster


https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj3w6IdTitlS8d5UvHJcCk9kOb57oXzLD2sEjOKqKuoTAdZKB3YWWHnm9XGyo1exmz1FUA0nJmYRnT-hXC83WOUKuU6jgSpKwNdPohxBmBJXA36YfrYo5YbzEsmIe6FWRUeplKwS53uq2E/s1600/monster.png

Myers, W. D. (1999). Monster. NY:  Harper.



This story was originally written as a screenplay through the eyes of its character, Steve.  Steve journals his thoughts about aspiring to be a filmmaker.  He is accused along with three other boys of a crime and must rely on his attorney, Kathy O’Brien.  The problem is that Kathy does not completely believe in his innocence.  Sandy Petrocelli is the State Prosecutor who labels these boys as monsters and the trial begins to unfold.  The death penalty is put on the table and the trial begins to break down witnesses and accounts of the crime.  Unfortunately, Steve claims to not remember where he was the day of the crime but proclaims his innocence. 

 

By the end of the story, we learn that Steve is proclaimed innocent while the defendant, King, is found guilty.  Steve chronicles the end of his ordeal by taking notice of his attorney’s behavior towards him.  Kohlber’s theory of moral development, postconventional level, details that what is known to be right, isn’t always that clear. 

Similar readings might include The skin I’m in or The sun also rises.

No comments:

Post a Comment